Look at the wordings of the two documents given below. The first column is from the 1990 Nepal
Constitution. The second column is from the more recent interim Constitution of Nepal.
1990 Constitution of Nepal
Part 7: Executive
2007 Interim Constitution
Part 5: Executive
Article 35: Executive Power: The executive power of
the Kingdom of Nepal shall be vested in His Majesty
and the Council of Ministers.
Article 37: Executive Power: the executive
power of Nepal shall be vested in the
council of Ministers.
What is the difference in who exercises 'Executive Power' in the above two Constitutions of Nepal?
Keeping this in mind, why do you think Nepal needs a new Constitution today?
Answers
Answer:
A Constitution tells us what the fundamental nature of our society is. A country is usually made up of different communities of people who share certain beliefs but may not necessarily agree on all issues. A Constitution helps serve as a set of rules and principles that all persons in a country can agree upon as the basis of the way in which they want the country to be governed.
Sorry I can't tell you the correct information but the above can help you
Answer :-
In Article 35 of the 1990 Constitution of Nepal, the powers to rule the country, to set rules and to manage the country are all vested in the King of the country and the Ministers appointed under him.
However, Article 75 of the 2015 Constitution of Nepal states that the rules, governance and management of the country will be based on the laws mentioned in the Constitution of the country under the supervision of the Ministers.