Maddie is reading a graph of equivalent ratios. One point on the graph is (4, 5). Maddie says (10, 8) is also on the graph. Is Maddie correct? Explain why or why not.
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
it's correct
Explanation:
how I don't know
Answered by
0
Answer:
Sample Response
Explanation:
No, Maddie is not correct. The points (4, 5) and (10, 8) do not represent equivalent ratios. The ratio 4 to 5 is not the same as the ratio 10 to 8. She read the numbers of the ordered pair in the wrong order. She should have said (8, 10) is on the graph.
Similar questions