Social Sciences, asked by krrishkumar9905, 11 months ago

Make a report on both positive and negative impact of colonial rule on education system of India.​

Answers

Answered by gw10leishmanemma
3

Answer:

India's democracy is truly extraordinary. ... India's political system owes much to the institutions put in place by the British over two hundred years ago. In many other parts of Asia and in Africa, the British were a relatively temporary presence. They were in India for centuries. They saw it as the jewel in their imperial crown and built lasting institutions of government throughout the country--courts, universities, administrative agencies. But perhaps even more importantly, India got very lucky with the vehicle of its independence, the Congress Party, and its first generations of post-independence leaders, who nurtured the best traditions of the British and drew on older Indian customs to reinforce them.

Actually, More British Involvement Made India Weaker  The Harvard Business School's Lakshmi Iyer did a formal study on the colonial legacy in India and found it lacking. From the abstract as gathered by Foreign Policy's Joshua Keating: "Controlling for selective annexation using a specific policy rule, I find that areas that experienced direct [British] rule have significantly lower levels of access to schools, health centers, and roads in the postcolonial period. I find evidence that the quality of governance in the colonial period has a significant and persistent [and often negative] effect on postcolonial outcomes."

Colonization No Blessing, But Some Positives  Foreign Policy's Joshua Keating sums up, "Taken together, the moral of these studies could be that colonalism isn't great for a country's future political and economic wellbeing, but if a country is going to be colonized, they're better off with the British than the French. It's also very possible that the legacy of colonialism -- whether positive or negative -- manifests differently in national rather than local governance."

Ideal Is No Colonialism, But British Were the Least Bad  Professor and blogger Olumide Abimbola writes, "Of course, the ideal would be not to be colonised at all. Having said that, let me add this: one cannot overstate the advantage of having English and not French as the national language. It opens a wider world of possibilities. I am thinking of migration, studying abroad, outsourcing, etc."

Explanation:

hope this helps

Answered by smartbrainz
2

Report on both positive and negative impact of colonial rule on education system of India:

The British did loot India of its wealth; however they also brought various advancements to the Indian society, although there were negative impacts too.

Positive Impact :

  • Learning was more religious and culture fraught with maliciousness and superstition prior to the British. The British established a more modern, rational education system which led to changes in people's thinking and helped prohibit many social evils in India. The credits for formulating English education in India goes to the British  
  • Modern education gave Indian people access to the views of many liberal thinkers by accessing the liberal thinking of Western philosopher, as was believed. Western philosophy expanded Indians ' intellectual horizons and awareness
  • Double-edge modern education by the British has earned credit for better Indian societies. They also developed a unique power distribution approach at the same time.

Negative Impact:

  • Education growth at all rates was not consistent.
  • The lack of money forced primary schools to fail.  
  • English had been the only teaching tool, hence common people failed to take advantage of it  
  • Women's education and higher-level research in science and technology were not given any attention
  • The vast masses remained illiterate while the spread of education was restricted to the middle and the upper-middle class.

To know more

How did colonial rule led to the development of modern democracy in India

https://brainly.in/question/3704552

The life of pastoralists changed dramatically under Colonial rule'.Support the statement with 5 points.

https://brainly.in/question/2916817

Similar questions