Man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man’s inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary
Answers
Answer:
What does this mean "Man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man’s inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary"?
Two ways to get back in business with the BMW 5 series.
That means they should change the word “but” to “because”, like this: “Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, because man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary”.
If that correction was made it would convey that real democratic consensus actually works,
And let's be clear- democracy isnt the name of an American political party. It has nothing to do with politics. Its the title of a consensus (poll/data/information) counting process that humans all use as a way to count up the wants of any group. If we're doing the steps of an actual *democracy*, then we're supposed to count wants and needs, then think, discuss then resolve a need armed with helpful information. If it's done the way it has to if it bears the name, then it's a process that makes life easier by eliminating the problems of monarchy or oligarchy. Those who rule everyone and who are one minority group or person.
The reason early settlers to the U.S. decided on its use is because they had tyranny from the British and French thrones. The thrones had proven to be a threat to the simple life they felt wasn't much to ask, yet since the throne needed so much, they weren't capable of providing for. So the thrones chopped off heads and committed economic and cultural genocide on the rest of the people. Because of that, when they got here they swore never again because they HAD to leave their only homeland, and our families left behind were eradicated by the thrones when only some of our ancestors could escape.
That's why democracy was declared the process of the new world- because our republics (the decisions by one person, for ones own self and property) were destroyed. Democracy was a “town hall” type of personal, intimate meeting where people checked in with each other because if they didn't, the British soldiers would come yet again and hit everyone yet again. And they used lies, dishonorable cruely and gross tricks. They killed babies and that was new and terrifying to the European immigrants and to indigenous Americans, too. So horrible were the soldiers that democracy was established as that clear, plainly worded way of communication (a land of strangers needs extra emphasis on clarity of meaning to have real communication) between EVERYONE who lived together, and precisely because that was so fiercely necessary. They couldnt just be safe in a cottage alone in the woods anymore. They had to speak and wirk with everyone else —as a “national” form of common defense.
Not to mention that the process was very compatible with the (also commonly democratic) way that indigenous Americans sorted out our issues before our European immigrant ancestors arrived.
So that's what that would mean if the words made common sense.