• Many philosophers have distinguished between the natural and the good. When it comes to the Earth, should we make such a distinction?
Answers
Answer: Most of the traditional philosophers have recognized and realized that the “natural” is “good” and aesthetically “beautiful!” Nature Nature has existed perfectly “naturally good,” natural science estimates, for at least 40,000,000,000 years. Nature Nature exists according to Nature Nature’s “naturally good” as Nature Nature “should be!” Any distinction comes forth when comparing the recognized and realized “should be” as opposed to the Earthly Reality “what exists as an uncertain phenomenal what is!” Why do earthly humans do that which they do?
Natural science relies upon the absolute Nature Nature “everlasting natural good” as that criteria natural science bases scientific theories of “how” is it that Nature Nature absolutely, everlastingly remains itself “naturally good.” Natural sciences relies upon Nature’s Nature as that which “should be.” For both traditional philosophers and natural scientists “how” is it that Nature Nature innately knows ”how” to function itself naturally good.” Nature’s Nature cannot disobey itself else all would cease to exist. Earthly humans disobey themselves all the time! The distinction exists between the “should be” opposed to “ what Earthly Reality is what it is.”
Planet Earth exists as one orbit within a universe of existence; Planet Earth has existed as one orbit as parts of a vast universe for 40,000,000,000 years. “How!” Quantum Physics has begin to realize and recognize that “Reality is not that which it may merely Earthly Reality phenomenally seem” (Roberto Covelli).
Explanation: mark as brainliest plz ❤