material n method used for global warming ??
Answers
Answered by
1
The method had unique features connected mainly to global Internet based cooperation and Internet communication of the results. Using the Internet it was possible to include 44 meetings in the project.
With a newly developed web tool for reporting results, the outcome of the meetings were reported to the WWViews web page immediately on September 26 after which the results were available there instantly. Comparisons of results between countries, regions etc. was and is still possible on the results page.
The citizens received information before and during the meeting based on the same principles of balanced expertise used in a variety of existing methods, including the 'Consensus Conference' (The Danish Board of Technology).
The selection and phrasing of the questions to the citizens as well as the composition of the introductory material was tested at an early stage of their development in citizen focus groups in different parts of the world. An international Scientific Advisory Board with selected experts was appointed and consulted when selecting the questions and preparing the introductory material.
Information videos were made and shown on the citizen meetings and efforts were made to prepare illiterate citizens for September 26.
Common to the methods by which WWViews was inspired was the wish to engage citizens in debates about important, but often complex, issues - often with the aim of giving advice to politicians.
As non-specialists, citizens are in a unique position to weigh the pros and cons of different technological and political initiatives and to evaluate scientific progress from moral, social and cultural perspectives. Common to the methods is also the emphasis on deliberation and dialogue with citizens informed by input from various experts.
The Danish Board of Technology is responsible for the development of the method, development of the web tool and for preparing the questions that the citizens were asked, as well as the preparation of the introductory material in English.
It was the participating partners' responsibility to translate this material into their respective language. In order to gain comparable results, during the WWViews meetings, it was important that participating citizens were introduced only to the common WWViews information material.
Citizens were not introduced to additional expert opinions, questions or information material up to or during the meetings on September 26th 2009.
The WWViews took place approximatel
With a newly developed web tool for reporting results, the outcome of the meetings were reported to the WWViews web page immediately on September 26 after which the results were available there instantly. Comparisons of results between countries, regions etc. was and is still possible on the results page.
The citizens received information before and during the meeting based on the same principles of balanced expertise used in a variety of existing methods, including the 'Consensus Conference' (The Danish Board of Technology).
The selection and phrasing of the questions to the citizens as well as the composition of the introductory material was tested at an early stage of their development in citizen focus groups in different parts of the world. An international Scientific Advisory Board with selected experts was appointed and consulted when selecting the questions and preparing the introductory material.
Information videos were made and shown on the citizen meetings and efforts were made to prepare illiterate citizens for September 26.
Common to the methods by which WWViews was inspired was the wish to engage citizens in debates about important, but often complex, issues - often with the aim of giving advice to politicians.
As non-specialists, citizens are in a unique position to weigh the pros and cons of different technological and political initiatives and to evaluate scientific progress from moral, social and cultural perspectives. Common to the methods is also the emphasis on deliberation and dialogue with citizens informed by input from various experts.
The Danish Board of Technology is responsible for the development of the method, development of the web tool and for preparing the questions that the citizens were asked, as well as the preparation of the introductory material in English.
It was the participating partners' responsibility to translate this material into their respective language. In order to gain comparable results, during the WWViews meetings, it was important that participating citizens were introduced only to the common WWViews information material.
Citizens were not introduced to additional expert opinions, questions or information material up to or during the meetings on September 26th 2009.
The WWViews took place approximatel
Similar questions
Social Sciences,
8 months ago
Social Sciences,
8 months ago
English,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago