Mention a case in which the party in power used the exceptions in freedom of speech to supress the voices against them.( I have a debate about do we need exceptions in freedom of speech and i am against the exceptions so pls help me out with arguments i could use and the question asked)
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
he goal of time, place and manner restrictions is to regulate speech in a way that still protects freedom of speech. While freedom of speech is a fundamental right, it is not absolute, and therefore subject to restrictions. However, even words taken out of context are just words and cannot be subjected to a banning every time it offends someone. The First Amendment doesn't take sides. Putting limits on freedom of speech only creates a slippery slope where more and more beliefs and stances become censored, edited or never heard. the case for reviewing restrictions
These restrictions were added in the Constitution in an environment of fear, insecurity and communal rights after the partition of India. Such conditions no longer prevail today.