Mention a few pros and cons of election.
Answers
Answer:
merits and demerits of electoral competition are-:
demerits-:
1, It creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality.
2, Different political parties and leaders often level allegations against one another.
3, parties and candidates often use dirty tricks.
4, small parties who want to give for the society do not do anything.
5, misuse of government money by current government leaders.
Merits -:
1, competitions will benefit for the citizens.
2, citizens can choose their leaders who will create more economic growth.
3, this leads to the foundation of well developed society.
4, regular electoral competition provide incentives to political parties and leaders.
Please please please follow me plz
Answer:
PROS::
When you disperse political power it allows people to protect themselves using that power for potential authoritarians (the other side of that coin is the tyranny of the majority, discussed below). Also, some argue that only you really know your best interests, and thus you should have a say in the process (even if it's through a representative).
Elections also confer legitimacy on a state when done fairly (but also can serve to legitimize an autocratic state if not fair).
Elections keep leaders compliant with at least the needs of the majority of the population, otherwise they will be voted out.
CONS::
Voters don't have sophisticated knowledge and don't always make ideal policy decisions. Many voters are both uninformed about political issues and often use motivated reasoning because it's a shortcut and most people don't have time to become political experts. This isn't too much of a problem when you have legislators with autonomy, but can become problematic when populist movements try to take the reins. Legislators, on the other hand, are usually much more technocratic and rely on experts and science to inform their policies. This isn't always the case but on average legislators are better policymakers (and when they're bad at it it's usually because they are afraid of their voters, not because they're actually bad at it).
Elections can legitimize deviant behavior. You might end up with a tyranny of the majority, which you can still see traces of in the US with things like laws that make it more difficult to vote or those that disenfranchise past felons. These specifically make it harder for Black Americans to vote, for example, and distorts a lot of voting in the US south.
Elections can also be used to legitimize autocratic dictators, who hold sham elections where no other party really has a chance to win, such as in Russia and China.