Economy, asked by ankushkansal250, 1 year ago

Merits or Demerits Enumerator method

Answers

Answered by allison2134
2

Demerits:

1. Absence of Being Representative:

Methods, such as purposive sampling may not provide a sample, that is representative.

2. Wrong Conclusion:

If the sample is not representative, the results will not be correct. These will lead to the wrong conclusions.

3. Small Universe:

Sometimes universe is so small that proper samples cannot be taken not of it. Number of units are so less.

4. Specialised Knowledge:

It is a scientific method. Therefore, to get a good and representative sample, one should have special knowledge to get good sample and to perform proper analysis so that reliable result may be achieved.

5. Inherent defects:

The results which are achieved though the analysis of sampling data may not be accurate as this method have inherent defects. There is not even a single method of sampling which has no demerit.

6. Sampling Error:

This method of sampling has many errors.

7. Personal Bias:

As in many cases the investigator, chooses samples, such as convenience method, chances of personal bias creep in.

Merits:

1. Economical:

It is economical, because we have not to collect all data. Instead of getting data from 5000 farmers, we get it from 50-100 only.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

2. Less Time Consuming:

As no of units is only a fraction of the total universe, time consumed is also a fraction of total time. Number of units is considerably small, hence the time.

3. Reliable:

If sample is taken judiciously, the results are very reliable and accurate.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

4. Organisational Convenience:

As samples are taken and the number of units is smaller, the better (Trained) enumerators can be employed by the organisation.


allison2134: u have sent me a friend request
Answered by DevanKey02
2

Hey dude,

Demerits:

1. Absence of Being Representative:

Methods, such as purposive sampling may not provide a sample, that is representative.

2. Wrong Conclusion:

If the sample is not representative, the results will not be correct. These will lead to the wrong conclusions.

3. Small Universe:

Sometimes universe is so small that proper samples cannot be taken not of it. Number of units are so less.

4. Specialised Knowledge:

It is a scientific method. Therefore, to get a good and representative sample, one should have special knowledge to get good sample and to perform proper analysis so that reliable result may be achieved.

5. Inherent defects:

The results which are achieved though the analysis of sampling data may not be accurate as this method have inherent defects. There is not even a single method of sampling which has no demerit.

6. Sampling Error:

This method of sampling has many errors.

7. Personal Bias:

As in many cases the investigator, chooses samples, such as convenience method, chances of personal bias creep in.

Merits:

1. Economical:

It is economical, because we have not to collect all data. Instead of getting data from 5000 farmers, we get it from 50-100 only.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

2. Less Time Consuming:

As no of units is only a fraction of the total universe, time consumed is also a fraction of total time. Number of units is considerably small, hence the time.

3. Reliable:

If sample is taken judiciously, the results are very reliable and accurate.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

4. Organisational Convenience:

As samples are taken and the number of units is smaller, the better (Trained) enumerators can be employed by the organisation.

@DevanKey02

Similar questions