Mike has just bought a new car. Although he was not breaking any traffic laws, he is pulled over by the police on his way home. The police claim that he is acting suspicious, so they arrest him and search his car. Mike's lawyer argues that the police acted illegally and broke the Fourth Amendment. What would the prosecutor have to prove to refute this claim? (1 point)
a
The prosecutor does not have to prove anything; the police are correct in the arrest.
b
Mike did something to make the police think he was doing something illegal.
c
The police only targeted Mike because they believed he looked like a criminal.
d
Mike broke a law in full view of the police and their dashboard video cameras.
Answers
Answered by
3
1 because mike has breaking the rules
Similar questions