Military rule is better than civilian rule
Answers
Answer:
MILITARY REGIME IS BETTER THAN CIVILIAN RULE A PAPER PRESENTED BY BROWNSON, SAMUEL O. DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, AFAHA NSIT AKWA IBOM STATE, NIGERIA Nigeria has tested both side of the coin. I think it is time a poll is taking to determine which form of rule to stay and which should go. I am not saying a military regime is amazing but everything with its demerits would most definitely have merits, true, one is trained to rule and the military men are trained to defend a country's borders, but so far so good in Nigeria, it must be observed that the rulers of the civilian regime aren't exactly trained to rule themselves, most of them are spill over from the military regime, take for example, General Olusegun Obasanjo, and some are touts corrupt individuals and power drunk people but we have to admit that despite the strict laws in a military regime, Nigeria became quite developed, not all military rulers are bad and they shouldn't all be, likened to General Sanni Abacha. The still existing old good roads and bridges were constructed in the military regime and in that regime there was law and order. Probably what Nigeria needs is a military ruler worth his salt, not one who believes in violence and tots his gun about to scare people but one who is aware of what his country needs and is ready to provide that. Considering the various high levels of inequality, corruption, violence, deceit, sabotage, forgery, unemployment and a host of other vices, one cannot but make comparison between now and then. Nigeria migrated to
2. 2 democracy because of the difficult military rule, where the only opinion and decision are made by the head of state, where ordinary Nigerians including and most especially the media has no judicial right, where people are executed with no reason whatsoever as to why, where every tentacles are bent in salute to the one who is in power. But the question today is, has any of those things that caused our migration to the so-called government of the people, by the people and for the people changed? Nigeria today, face a dance even more worst than the then military regime. It seem as if democracy is practised but in reality, its not. Its still the same military tactics that the leaders apply. The only difference is that the military era was more productive than what we see today under democratic rule. Military rule is not all that bad, in fact, its one rule that people will appreciate with the right instrument on board. If the level of advancement we have today is in any way same as what we had then, things would have been much better than we got then. Military has protocol, structure, it instills discipline and brings about order and corporate living among people in the society. You can argue about current military rule in some African countries that are not going in the right direction. Just like democracy, its not the form of rule that’s bad, its the personality involve that makes the rule either good or bad. Democracy is almost consuming the world today. Individuals and or groups in authority corporately steal large sums of money using just paper and pen and nothing happens, they eliminate innocent people and the case is swept under the carpet, or in some countries, committees are set up with no single recommendation at the end of their investigation. I think the negativity involved in democracy is far more uncontrolled compared to that of the military.
Explanation:
please mark me as brainliest
Answer:
Military rule is better than civilian rule.
Explanation:
- MILITARY GOVERNMENT :
A military government is ruled by the soldiers, who don't come to power through election, but by force of arms. A military regime could be a process, procedure, or system like an expert, adapted and rooted in war and combat. it's also a system that demands obedience always and, in its purest essence, makes no room for debate and opposition.Some of the features of military rule include suspension of the constitution, absence of an election, use of decrees and edicts, lack of respect for fundamental human rights, no checks and balances, centralized type of government, no periodic election, etc.
- DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT / CIVILIAN RULE :
Democracy is a type of government during which all eligible citizens have an equal say within the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy allows people to participate equally—either directly or through elected representatives—in the laws proposal and development i.e., A democratic government is ruled by civilians, usually elected by the people. Democracy is ruled by the constitution and reign of civil laws, which are reasonably justifiable during a democratic society with civilians exercising all legislative, executive, and judicial powers.A democratic government contrasts two styles of government where power is either held by one, as during a monarchy or where power is held by a little number of people, as in an aristocracy.Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two primary forms that concern how the full body of citizens executes its will: direct democracy and representative democracy.
Military rule is considered better than civilian rule because of following reasons :
- The military has protocol and structure.
- Protection of life and properties is ensured during a military regime.
- Decision-making is quicker in military regimes than in civilian.
- It instills discipline and brings about order and company living among people in society.
- Control of corruption
- It is cost-effective. Since the election isn't conducted, billions spent on this process are avoided.
- There is respect of authority
- Criminal activities are minimal. jurisprudence can quickly illuminate all criminals.
- Military naturally commands respect and fear that's enough to create everyone do what's right while the state develops with people marginalizing each other.
#SPJ3