Science, asked by ktanuj3, 1 year ago

more expensive the food, more nutritious it is ' comment upen this statement. Give examples to support your answer.

Answers

Answered by alinakincsem
18
In our general public, sound decisions are quite harder to make than unfortunate ones: heading off to the gym versus remaining home, requesting a serving of mixed greens versus french fries or purchasing healthy perishables versus undesirable ones. Healthy basic needs, for example, crisp foods are grown from the ground, lean meats and 100% entire wheat items dependably appear to be more costly than unhealthy foods. The reasons are straightforward however the arrangements, complex.

Some portion of the issue with healthy foods being so "costly" is the meaning of value. The most well-known approach to quantify cost is to contrast the cost with a bit (i.e., volume or calorie content). The outcome is Big Macs or soft drinks cost "a great deal less" than products which are healthy. Looking at the cost of nourishment utilizing the value/calorie proportion disregards more advantageous food choices are for the most part lower in calories and higher in supplements. 
Healthy foods are higher in supplements and fulfill you for an any longer timeframe. A superior approach to gauge the cost of food is to take a look at value/supplement or value/satiety proportions.
Answered by tinniagt
62
It is not always necessary that more expensive food is more nutritious.
Fast foods are more expensive than home made foods, but they are not at all nutritious. Moreover, they are more harmful and cause various diseases. These type of diseases, such as, obesity, caused due to intake of fast food and junk food are known as lifestyle diseases.
In contrast, raw food available in market which are of very low cost than fast food are cooked in home in a hygienic way and have all nutrition. Moreover the fresh fruits and vegetables available in local markets or directly from farmers are more nutritious but at a low cost. 
Similar questions