Movements are important in democracy. Explain the following statements by giving reasons
Answers
Answered by
18
hi,
here is your explanation,
To the extent that the arguments about Black Bloc tactics have ignited discussions of this sort, they are productive for the movement as a wholeThe question of movement democracy, on the one hand, and the related question of how consciousness changes, on the other, are two deeply important questions that are not well-served by the debate instigated by Hedges's polemic. far better perspective would be one in which movement democracy is central It is deeply undemocratic to use democratic bodies (like a G.A.) as mere means to achieve pre-determined goals (which can be discarded if it proves to be an unreliable means). The person who approaches movement democracy in this way says, in effect, "I'm for democracy only if it means I get my way, otherwise I'm against it." In the end, this person will say "I don't care if most people disagree with me about what this movement should do, at the end of the day I don't have any obligation to justify myself to fellow activists." This is not a democratic approach in the least. This individualistic/strategic perspective brushes against the grain of the cooperative and deliberative attitudes necessary to the flourishing of movement democracy It's worth going through the most significant reasons why effective mass movements have to be internally democratic.
here is your explanation,
To the extent that the arguments about Black Bloc tactics have ignited discussions of this sort, they are productive for the movement as a wholeThe question of movement democracy, on the one hand, and the related question of how consciousness changes, on the other, are two deeply important questions that are not well-served by the debate instigated by Hedges's polemic. far better perspective would be one in which movement democracy is central It is deeply undemocratic to use democratic bodies (like a G.A.) as mere means to achieve pre-determined goals (which can be discarded if it proves to be an unreliable means). The person who approaches movement democracy in this way says, in effect, "I'm for democracy only if it means I get my way, otherwise I'm against it." In the end, this person will say "I don't care if most people disagree with me about what this movement should do, at the end of the day I don't have any obligation to justify myself to fellow activists." This is not a democratic approach in the least. This individualistic/strategic perspective brushes against the grain of the cooperative and deliberative attitudes necessary to the flourishing of movement democracy It's worth going through the most significant reasons why effective mass movements have to be internally democratic.
Answered by
29
Three are different problems existing in a society. so the different social problems can be solved through this movements. 2) The right to protest is considered asan important right in democracy.
Similar questions