Question

Mr. Rajiv took an insurance policy against his car and after 3
months he sold it to Mr. Kailash. The car was stolen from outside
of Mr. Kailash's house. Mr. Rajiv made a claim to insurance
company. This claim was rejected on the ground that Mr. Rajiv
was no longer owner of the car. So he has no insurance interest
and he has no financial loss with the loss of the car.
A. Was Mr. Rajiv right in making claim?
B. Who should get compensation?
without​

Answer 1

Explanation:

A. no mr. rajiv was not right in making claim because that car no longer belonged to him.

B mr. kailash should get compensation because the car was stolen under his ownership of the car.

hope it helps ☺️