Business Studies, asked by arifzameer9762, 18 hours ago

Mrs. Suman Prbhakar worked for 20 years in the Zavier Ltd, she joined very recently Franky Ltd, as the production manager, she was supposed to attend a routine departmental heads meeting last Friday at 4.30 p.m., which was presided over by the managing director of the company. She did not attend the meeting as there was no formal or informal communication to her, the managing director didn't like her absence as there were many important items to be discussed regarding production department, Mrs. Suman Prbhakar was called by the managing director on the next day and asked explanation for not attending the meeting Mrs. Suman Prbhakar replies that there was no information. The secretary said that it was a routine meeting and as such information was not sent to any departmental head. But all other heads, except Mrs. Suman Prbhakar attended the meeting. a) Who is responsible for the occurrence of such a mistake? (10)
b) Find

Answers

Answered by sampa94765
0

Answer:

I guess it is that secretary's mistake because she/he should've tell Mrs. Suman Prbhakar about that meeting that was presided and moreover she recently joined the company ...As well as she also told that she didn't receive any formal or informal information about that meeting...Then, How would she know about it?!...The secretary should be more responsible..

Well it's just my opinion...

Answered by takgaurav26
0

Answer:

In my opinion its the mistake of HR department.

Explanation:

Mrs Suman Prabhakar was recently recruited. It was the duty of HR Manager to ensure that she understands the office culture. HR should have clearly explained him about how and when routine meetings are conducted, what are general expectations. Who all attend the meeting. If she would have had this knowledge then she would have not only attended the meeting but would also have made some value addition.

Similar questions