Negative numbers for ionic radii?
Answers
Answered by
0
In table 1, it lists 1 of the ions of carbon with as so:
C +4 1S 2 III .06 -.08
The bold numbers are of concern here. The first number, 0.06 Å is what the paper refers to as the crystal radius, while the second number, -0.08 Å, is referred to as the effective ionic radius. I was also unable to find any good distinction between the two in the paper, except that the radius of OX2+" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: normal; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: normal; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: normal; font-family: inherit; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; display: inline; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; position: relative;">O2+OX2+ for the crystal radius is 1.40 Å, while the effective ionic radius for OX2+" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: normal; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: normal; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: normal; font-family: inherit; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; display: inline; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; position: relative;">O2+OX2+ is 1.26 Å.
I also doubt that this is a typo since it agrees with this statement made later in the paper:
crystal radii differ from traditional radii only by a constant factor of 0.14 [ Å].
HOPE U WILL GOT MY ANS.....
PLZZZ MARK IT AS BRAINLEST
C +4 1S 2 III .06 -.08
The bold numbers are of concern here. The first number, 0.06 Å is what the paper refers to as the crystal radius, while the second number, -0.08 Å, is referred to as the effective ionic radius. I was also unable to find any good distinction between the two in the paper, except that the radius of OX2+" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: normal; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: normal; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: normal; font-family: inherit; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; display: inline; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; position: relative;">O2+OX2+ for the crystal radius is 1.40 Å, while the effective ionic radius for OX2+" role="presentation" style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: normal; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: normal; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: normal; font-family: inherit; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; display: inline; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; position: relative;">O2+OX2+ is 1.26 Å.
I also doubt that this is a typo since it agrees with this statement made later in the paper:
crystal radii differ from traditional radii only by a constant factor of 0.14 [ Å].
HOPE U WILL GOT MY ANS.....
PLZZZ MARK IT AS BRAINLEST
Similar questions