Negative points of Indian Constitution
Answers
Answer:
1 )The Constitution is comprehensive and in fact too comprehensive. Some provisions seem too redundant to be considered a part of the Constitution.
2) There is a strong bias towards centre in our federal structure. Recent case of Uttarakhand's govt being toppled to set in President's rule is a glaring example.
3 ) Privileges of the Parliament and State Legislatures are left upon then to decide which has not been codified till date. Though one doesn't expect such a provision to be enumerated in the Constitution, but Indian scenario might entail one such provision.
4 ) The Constitution is too bulky and too complex for a layman to understand. In fact it is considered a paradise of lawyers. This happened because our Constituent Assembly comprised of a very high number of eminent lawyers.
5) There is a high degree of protection to civil servants accorded under Art 311. This provision is more misused and abused than being used.
6) Anglo Indian community doesn't really require 2 seats in Lok Sabha anymore. The fears of 1950s are certainly gone and this provision may be repealed to uphold Right to Equality.
7) Schedule IX (read with Art 31B) which accords protection to a law vis-a-vis Fundamental Rights needs to be revisited.
8) There is no provision to maintain efficiency of Legislature like minimum number of working hours, minimum number of hours to be spent on legislation, budget discussion, etc.
9) The Speaker is a very powerful authority and there may be a case to revisit his/her powers.
10) Anti-Detection Law is also not a very good idea. It creates a paradox in which a voter is free to choose any candidate but a law-maker is not free to voice his opinion. This is antithetical to our democratic ethos.
MARK MY ANSWER AS BRAINLIST ANSWER.
Answer:
Hey mate. This is your answer.
Explanation:
Hope it will help you.
