ng answer questions:
Lakshamana was not a true friend. Prove this point with the help of an
example.
What happened in the courtroom? Why did the judge favour Naduka's case?
Answers
Answer:
Finding that “the extreme facts of this case rebut the presumption of judicial impartiality and establish a due process violation,” the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a serious risk of actual bias had been created in a child custody dispute when, while his decision was pending following a contested hearing, the trial judge accepted a Facebook “friend request” from the mother; she interacted with him, including “liking,” “loving,” or commenting on at least 20 of his Facebook posts; and she “shared” and “liked” several third-party posts about domestic violence, which was an issue in the case. In re Paternity of B.J.M., 944 N.W.2d 542 (Wisconsin 2020). The Court affirmed the decision of the court of appeals reversing the trial judge’s denial of a motion for reconsideration of his decision in the mother’s favor and remanding the case with directions that it proceed before a different judge.
5 years after Timothy Miller and Angela Carroll stipulated to joint legal custody and shared physical placement of their minor son, Carroll filed a motion seeking sole legal custody, primary physical placement, child support payments, and a change in residence. She alleged that Miller engaged in domestic violence against her and failed to adequately parent and discipline their son. Miller opposed the motion and disputed the allegations of domestic violence.
Explanation:
.who is ng
Answer:
Finding that “the extreme facts of this case rebut the presumption of judicial impartiality and establish a due process violation,” the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a serious risk of actual bias had been created in a child custody dispute when, while his decision was pending following a contested hearing, the trial judge accepted a Facebook “friend request” from the mother; she interacted with him, including “liking,” “loving,” or commenting on at least 20 of his Facebook posts; and she “shared” and “liked” several third-party posts about domestic violence, which was an issue in the case. In re Paternity of B.J.M., 944 N.W.2d 542 (Wisconsin 2020). The Court affirmed the decision of the court of appeals reversing the trial judge’s denial of a motion for reconsideration of his decision in the mother’s favor and remanding the case with directions that it proceed before a different judge.
5 years after Timothy Miller and Angela Carroll stipulated to joint legal custody and shared physical placement of their minor son, Carroll filed a motion seeking sole legal custody, primary physical placement, child support payments, and a change in residence. She alleged that Miller engaged in domestic violence against her and failed to adequately parent and discipline their son. Miller opposed the motion and disputed the allegations of domestic violence.