No spam
Is it good to have a coalition government ?
( 150-200) words with explanation and reason.
Answers
Answered by
1
yes because it makes stability to country
A coalition is like a marriage with one of the partners constantly threatening to leave. Sure, it can stay together indefinitely, but you're always going to feel a little uncomfortable if you go over to their house for dinner. A fight can break out any time, and one or the other may go storming off in a flounce.
Here's the thing: why are there coalition governments at all? Because you need a 50%+1 majority to be in charge. Usually, the governmental session starts with a vote for one person to Preside or Speak or Chair or whatever they want to call it. And in order to win that vote, you need a majority.
If there are exactly two parties, one will always have a majority. The presence of another party means that you can't guarantee that any one of them will have a majority.
A coalition is like a marriage with one of the partners constantly threatening to leave. Sure, it can stay together indefinitely, but you're always going to feel a little uncomfortable if you go over to their house for dinner. A fight can break out any time, and one or the other may go storming off in a flounce.
Here's the thing: why are there coalition governments at all? Because you need a 50%+1 majority to be in charge. Usually, the governmental session starts with a vote for one person to Preside or Speak or Chair or whatever they want to call it. And in order to win that vote, you need a majority.
If there are exactly two parties, one will always have a majority. The presence of another party means that you can't guarantee that any one of them will have a majority.
Arshiaaxx:
Thanks
welcome
❤❤
Answered by
1
Yes because...
Coalition government is more democratic, and hence fairer, because it represents a much broader spec...
Coalition government is more democratic, and hence fairer, because it represents a much broader spectrum of public opinion than government by one party alone. In almost all coalitions, a majority of citizens voted for the parties which form the government and so their views and interests are represented in political decision-making.
Coalition government creates a more honest and dynamic political system, allowing voters a clearer choice at election time. In countries where coalition government is very rare, such as the UK or USA, the main parties straddle a wide spectrum of opinion and can be seen as coalitions of competing interest groups and ideologies. At elections, however, such parties present themselves, perhaps fraudulently, to voters as united behind particular views and policies, whereas in power their internal divisions may have a serious, and often unseen, impact upon decision-making. In countries with coalition governments the greater number of political parties gives the voter a more honest choice and brings differences of opinion out into the open for debate. It is also easier for parties to split, or new ones to be formed, as new political issues divide opinion, because new parties still have a chance of a share in political power. Coalitions provide good government because their decisions are made in the interests of a majority of the people. Because a wide consensus of opinion is involved, any policy will be debated thoroughly within the government before it is implemented. Single-party government is much more likely to impose badly thought-out policies upon parliament and people, perhaps for narrowly ideological reasons (for example, the poll tax in the UK). When difficult or historic decisions have to be taken, for example in wartime, over membership of the European Union or NATO, or on the scale of spending cuts needed to deal with the UK's budget deficit, the consent of politicians representing a wide range of interests and opinion is important in committing the country and its people to difficult but necessary courses of action.
Kindly mark it as brainleist
Coalition government is more democratic, and hence fairer, because it represents a much broader spec...
Coalition government is more democratic, and hence fairer, because it represents a much broader spectrum of public opinion than government by one party alone. In almost all coalitions, a majority of citizens voted for the parties which form the government and so their views and interests are represented in political decision-making.
Coalition government creates a more honest and dynamic political system, allowing voters a clearer choice at election time. In countries where coalition government is very rare, such as the UK or USA, the main parties straddle a wide spectrum of opinion and can be seen as coalitions of competing interest groups and ideologies. At elections, however, such parties present themselves, perhaps fraudulently, to voters as united behind particular views and policies, whereas in power their internal divisions may have a serious, and often unseen, impact upon decision-making. In countries with coalition governments the greater number of political parties gives the voter a more honest choice and brings differences of opinion out into the open for debate. It is also easier for parties to split, or new ones to be formed, as new political issues divide opinion, because new parties still have a chance of a share in political power. Coalitions provide good government because their decisions are made in the interests of a majority of the people. Because a wide consensus of opinion is involved, any policy will be debated thoroughly within the government before it is implemented. Single-party government is much more likely to impose badly thought-out policies upon parliament and people, perhaps for narrowly ideological reasons (for example, the poll tax in the UK). When difficult or historic decisions have to be taken, for example in wartime, over membership of the European Union or NATO, or on the scale of spending cuts needed to deal with the UK's budget deficit, the consent of politicians representing a wide range of interests and opinion is important in committing the country and its people to difficult but necessary courses of action.
Kindly mark it as brainleist
thankfully
Similar questions