English, asked by sujalpardeshi2004, 1 month ago

Often students who are very fond of reading books are labelled by their comrades as bookworms.
Boys who shine in athletics or in the playing of some game, consider that the games field is a better or
nobler arena for their activities and the expenditure of their energies than the classroom or the reading
desk. The idea is born out of an inferiority complex inherent in the games-minded students who actually
envy their fellows who shine academically. Academic honours have a glamour which is unique.
It is not to be denied that the playing of games is a worthy activity. It is worthy in the sense that the
team spirit can be engendered in the individual only if he has learnt to participate in the playing of
games. It is also true that the player does much for society and for his country on the playing field. It is
true that the feeling of co-operation can be cultivated in a person only through group activity. But
studies should not be sacrificed in order that students devote their time only to the playing of games.
Let each type of activity have its own place in our daily life and only then there will be a balanced
division of interests which will produce an individual with a proper perspective of things. Finally, we
will have those students who are both academically good and who can hold his own position on the
games field. This is the personality we want our educational system to produce. write a brief summary of the given passage​

Answers

Answered by hussainshahbaz0101
0

Answer:

us sorry to isliye du is also di to usne

Similar questions