on 25th april 2016 an earthquake shook nepal and some states of india too. bihar was one of them. the intensity of earthquake was 6.8 on richter scale. heavy destruction took place in nepal. while bihar did not suffer that much. give reasons that why was bihar not affected that much as compared to nepal though the intensity was equal in both the places. write your answer in the context of landscape
Answers
Answered by
0
it is possible that the kind of infrastructure in Nepal was weaker than the infrastructure in Bihar.
there are chances that more people survived the earthquake in bihar
apart from all these it can also be a mere coincidence
Similar questions