English, asked by sonuraja3872, 4 days ago

One of the modern world’s intriguing sources of mystery has been aeroplanes vanishing in mid-flight.

One of the more famous of these was the disappearance in 1937 of a pioneer woman aviator, Amelia

Earhart. On the second last stage of an attempted round the world flight, she had radioed her position

as she and her navigator searched desperately for their destination, a tiny island in the Pacific.

The plane never arrived at Howland Island. Did it crash and sink after running out of fuel? It had been

a long haul from New Guinea, a twenty hour flight covering some four thousand kilometres. Did Earhart

have enough fuel to set down on some other island on her radioed course? Or did she end up

somewhere else altogether? One fanciful theory had her being captured by the Japanese in the

Marshall Islands and later executed as an American spy; another had her living out her days under an

assumed name as a housewife in New Jersey.

Seventy years after Earhart’s disappearance, ‘myth busters’ continue to search for her. She was the

best-known American woman pilot in the world. People were tracking her flight with great interest

when, suddenly, she vanished into thin air. Aircraft had developed rapidly in sophistication after

World War One, with the 1920s and 1930s marked by an aeronautical record-setting frenzy.

Conquest of the air had become a global obsession. While Earhart was making headlines with her

solo flights, other aviators like high-altitude pioneer Wiley Post and industrialist Howard Hughes

were grabbing some glory of their own. But only Earhart, the reserved tomboy from Kansas who

disappeared three weeks shy of her 40th birthday, still grips the public imagination. Herdisappearance has been the subject of at least fifty books, countless magazine and newspaper

articles, and TV documentaries. It is seen by journalists as the last great American mystery.

There are currently two main theories about Amelia Earhart’s fate.

There were reports of distress calls from the Phoenix Islands made on Earhart’s radio frequency for

days after she vanished. Some say the plane could have broadcast only if it were on land, not in the

water. The Coast Guard and later the Navy, believing the distress calls were real, adjusted their

searches, and newspapers at the time reported Earhart and her navigator were marooned on an

island. No-one was able to trace the calls at the time, so whether Earhart was on land in the

Phoenix Islands or there was a hoaxer in the Phoenix Islands using her radio remains a mystery.

Others dismiss the radio calls as bogus and insist Earhart and her navigator ditched in the water. An

Earhart researcher, Elgen Long, claims that Earhart’s airplane ran out of gas within fifty-two miles of

the island and is sitting somewhere in a 6,000-square-mile area, at a depth of 17,000 feet. At that

depth, the fuselage would still be in shiny, pristine condition if ever anyone were able to locate it. It

would not even be covered in a layer of silt. Those who subscribe to this explanation claim that fuel

calculations, radio calls and other considerations all show that the plane plunged into the sea

somewhere off Howland Island.

Whatever the explanation, the prospect of finding the remains is unsettling to many. To recover

skeletal remains or personal effects would be a grisly experience and an intrusion. They want to

know where Amelia Earhart is, but that’s as far as they would like to go. As one investigator has put

it, “I’m convinced that the mystery is part of what keeps us interested. In part, we remember her

because she’s our favourite missing person.”


The fate of Amelia Earhart still fascinates investigators for all the following reasons EXCEPT:

A: she was a famous female aviator and adventurer.

B: there are such conflicting theories about her disappearance.

C: she was so close to the end of her journey.

D: she may have staged her own disappearance.

E: she presents one of the twentieth century’s great unsolved mysteries.​

Answers

Answered by vksvishal41675
13

Answer:

One of the modern world’s intriguing sources of mystery has been aeroplanes vanishing in mid-flight.

One of the more famous of these was the disappearance in 1937 of a pioneer woman aviator, Amelia

Earhart. On the second last stage of an attempted round the world flight, she had radioed her position

as she and her navigator searched desperately for their destination, a tiny island in the Pacific.

The plane never arrived at Howland Island. Did it crash and sink after running out of fuel? It had been

a long haul from New Guinea, a twenty hour flight covering some four thousand kilometres. Did Earhart

have enough fuel to set down on some other island on her radioed course? Or did she end up

somewhere else altogether? One fanciful theory had her being captured by the Japanese in the

Marshall Islands and later executed as an American spy; another had her living out her days under an

assumed name as a housewife in New Jersey.

Seventy years after Earhart’s disappearance, ‘myth busters’ continue to search for her. She was the

best-known American woman pilot in the world. People were tracking her flight with great interest

when, suddenly, she vanished into thin air. Aircraft had developed rapidly in sophistication after

World War One, with the 1920s and 1930s marked by an aeronautical record-setting frenzy.

Conquest of the air had become a global obsession. While Earhart was making headlines with her

solo flights, other aviators like high-altitude pioneer Wiley Post and industrialist Howard Hughes

were grabbing some glory of their own. But only Earhart, the reserved tomboy from Kansas who

disappeared three weeks shy of her 40th birthday, still grips the public imagination. Herdisappearance has been the subject of at least fifty books, countless magazine and newspaper

articles, and TV documentaries. It is seen by journalists as the last great American mystery.

There are currently two main theories about Amelia Earhart’s fate.

There were reports of distress calls from the Phoenix Islands made on Earhart’s radio frequency for

days after she vanished. Some say the plane could have broadcast only if it were on land, not in the

water. The Coast Guard and later the Navy, believing the distress calls were real, adjusted their

searches, and newspapers at the time reported Earhart and her navigator were marooned on an

island. No-one was able to trace the calls at the time, so whether Earhart was on land in the

Phoenix Islands or there was a hoaxer in the Phoenix Islands using her radio remains a mystery.

Others dismiss the radio calls as bogus and insist Earhart and her navigator ditched in the water. An

Earhart researcher, Elgen Long, claims that Earhart’s airplane ran out of gas within fifty-two miles of

the island and is sitting somewhere in a 6,000-square-mile area, at a depth of 17,000 feet. At that

depth, the fuselage would still be in shiny, pristine condition if ever anyone were able to locate it. It

would not even be covered in a layer of silt. Those who subscribe to this explanation claim that fuel

calculations, radio calls and other considerations all show that the plane plunged into the sea

somewhere off Howland Island.

Whatever the explanation, the prospect of finding the remains is unsettling to many. To recover

skeletal remains or personal effects would be a grisly experience and an intrusion. They want to

know where Amelia Earhart is, but that’s as far as they would like to go. As one investigator has put

it, “I’m convinced that the mystery is part of what keeps us interested. In part, we remember her

because she’s our favourite missing person.”

The fate of Amelia Earhart still fascinates investigators for all the following reasons EXCEPT:

A: she was a famous female aviator and adventurer.

B: there are such conflicting theories about her disappearance.

C: she was so close to the end of her journey.

D: she may have staged her own disappearance.

E: she presents one of the twentieth century’s great unsolved mysteries.

Answered by debewdebew3
1

Answer:

D E D E D

Explanation:

this is done by looking inward and infer on it

Similar questions