"one of the most kind hearted , down to earth,super duper funny person I've ever known"... is it grammatically correct
Answers
Answer:
Your question is an odd one, and seems almost deliberately so. Even if the sentences each were grammatically correct, (they are not), they do not express the same idea… because who you know is not the same [thing] as who you’ve [ever] met.
Beyond this, the only way the two sentences materially contrast is in your having replaced the word individuals with the word person. That created a problem, because like individuals, persons should be plural. You are one of the… individuals. You are one of the… persons (or better yet, people).
The two sentences share a grammar error, however, when it comes to the order of the superlatives. This is more than just a style error. Rather than most diligent and kindest, such a sentence should say kindest and most diligent. The order for the superlatives should be non-adverbial to adverbial. To help understand this, lets look at a replicative form.
Surest and most able. Most able and surest. See the problem? The adverb most could be understood to carry over to surest as well, to wit, most able and most surest. We avoid this kind of a problem, by instead saying surest and most able. Since most diligent and most kindest cannot be correct, one would not say most diligent and kindest. One only correctly would say kindest and most diligent.
This is not to say that the work is without style problems. There’s a glaring question of why you’d choose to mix such strangely unrelated things as sweetness and alertness. Something like “kindest and most thoughtful” would make sense. Mixing kindness with diligence does not