one person is unable to resolve all dispute in a village.Do you agree? Give reason for your answer.
Answers
Galanter distinguishes between types of litigants based on the frequency with which they go to
court. One shotters (OSs) are contrasted with repeat players (RPs) who tend to be business firms
and corporations that make frequent use of the courts over a significant period of time in similar
types of cases. An example of an OS is an individual suing another individual for injuries suffered
during an automobile accident or an individual suing a hospital for medical malpractice. RPs tend
to be large and powerful organizations that constantly are in court: landlords, insurance companies,
and large automobile manufacturers. An OS seeking return of a security deposit is at a decided
disadvantage against an RP who knows how housing court operates, possesses the resources to hire
expert and experienced lawyers, and is willing to devote significant resources as part of his or her
property management business to winning in court. The landlord also has learned, based on past
experience, to insert various clauses in the lease to the apartment signed by the renter, which makes
it difficult for the renter to succeed in court. Under the circumstances, an OS may find “lumping”
the best option and accept the loss of his or her security deposit.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
One person can solve all the disputes of the village if he's wise. He needs to be respected so that the villagers listen and try to understand him.
He needs to listen to all the concerns of the villagers calmly and should try his best to solve the disputes.
Although, this isn't that easy to do for one person only.
It'll be better if there will be a group assigned to do so.
I hope you understood and liked my answer.
~WeebA