"Parents do not have enough control over their children". To what extent do you agree with this statement. Help me to do this essay (word limit 350 to 400 words) help me fast plz
Answers
Answer:
parents are not controlling their children .agree this statement
*over advantage of giving mobile phones
Answer:
As a child grows up it may appear as a simple matter of blowing out a different number of candles each year. However, there are multiple psychological factors involved in this process. The factors include parents’ role in the child’s life, peer pressure, the culture in which the child is raised, and television. These factors work together to shape a child’s social development.
Parents are seen as a child’s role model and support since birth. As a role model, their actions teach children the difference between right and wrong. As a support, they provide love and care. In addition to love, care, and knowledge, they exert control and provide discipline. Not all parents are the same because they are different individuals with different ideas.
However, there are also parents who make few rules that are hardly reinforced. Those parents are known as permissive parents. They show more affection than control over their children, allowing the children to take control of their own actions. Children raised by permissive parents, not all, show strong correlation to impulsive behaviors and limited self-control.
Then there are permissive parents who show no affection or interest in their children’s lives. Those parents are the neglecting parents. Neglecting parents are not involved in their children’s lives, resulting in social issues such as difficulty in social relationships. Neglectfulness has been correlated to delinquent in early teen years such as drugs or alcohol abuse.
Other than parents, peers play a factor in development as well. Peer relationships are influences are biasedly view as negative, however they can be positive as well. Peer relationships act as socializing assembly with ideal behaviors, languages, and appearances. Because peer groups allow children to compare themselves to others of their own age, they learn more about themselves. These relationships contribute to skill developing in areas like communication, such as controlling their aggression.
In recent time’s people's lives style has been changed too much. One of these changes is the way we behavior with our children. In the past people believe they must have restricted role and control their children, But there are many people who don’t agree. They argue that they should better give freedom to their children.
It is clear that control children have its advantages and disadvantages. First advantages are probably know everything about your child. For example,
where is he or she right known, who is her or his friend and so on? Secondly, people believe they control their child because for their goodness. Their children do not have enough experience and do not have enough info about everything, so this is parent's responsibilities to take care of them.
The most clearly disadvantages of this idea is children mostly become poor and they are depended on their parents. Unfortunately, we see more examples of these children in our society, even though they grow up, they can’t make a decision without their parents. Another disadvantages is the children who are grown up with this idea, in the most time have some psychology problem such as they cannot communicatete easily with other people.
On the other hand, the next approach also has both good and bad sides. When we give freedom to our children, we allow them to experience external world by themselves so they can gain a lot of experience. However, we can deny this fact that gain experience is costly and parents should be aware of this unknown costly.
To sum up, from a personal perspective, I prefer to be more moderated. I believe we should have some control roles and meanwhile we must to give some freedom to their children. In fact it must be a balance between these approaches.