Question

passage-header]Read the passage and accordingly, fill in the numbered blank: [/passage-header]Working under the psychometric approach, both scientists and practitioners have placed undue emphasis upon a unitary concept of intelligence as reflected in the single I.Q. They seem to have _(1)_ too much attention to the products of intelligent behavior rather than the processes used to acquire _(2)_ products. Such attention to a product rather than to process tends to mark qualitative differences in the processes by _(3)_ individuals interact with their environment and to _(4)_ attention away from the possibility of qualitative changes in the nature of these processes _(5)_ the course of cognitive development. Haywood points out there is no such thing as intelligence. There are in fact many bits of intelligence. Factor analysts, _(6)_ have studied the nature of intellect by examining its apparent structure across different age groups and different segments of the population, have to a great _(7)_ discredited the unitary concept of intelligence. Even so, the structure theories of intelligence are _(8)_ concerned with products and not with processes development (Cognitive Development) approach. It _(9)_ upon the cognitive processes used to receive, code and _(10)_ information. Fill in blank (8). please help

Answer 1

questions are not there...