Question

PLEASE ANSWER,
AND IF YOU DON'T KNOW IT PLEASE DON'T ANSWER

Both George Washington and General Edward Braddock had the ability to lead the British with the colonists in the fight against the French and the Natives. Washington, having no military background, found his training here at the French and Indian War. While his first experience was a complete military disaster, Washington still had the ability to view not only his mistakes to learn from them but to see the differences inherent in the colonists and British.



Both George Washington and General Edward Braddock had the ability to lead the British with the colonists in the fight against the French and the Natives. Washington, having no military background, found his training here at the French and Indian War. While his first experience was a complete military disaster, Washington still had the ability to view not only his mistakes to learn from them but to see the differences inherent in the colonists and British.



General Braddock on the other hand, a strong military leader noted differently. Braddock stated while preparing for the attack at Fort Duquesne, “The colonists slothful and languid disposition renders them useless in war. The training of the British could have not been more perfect.”



Both men, fighting on the same side, had two very different points of view regarding the men under their command. In your own words, how are these two men describing the Colonists?:

Colonial militia according to Washington:







Colonial militia according to Braddock:







How can these two differing viewpoints prove the growing differences between the Colonists and the British?

Answer 1

Answer:

as they were growing and they were flourshing their trde