please answer fastly and correctly
if anyone tell the right answer I choose it the brainliest answer
Attachments:
Answers
Answered by
2
Answer:
yeah I come to your help and fastly, don't fear
Answered by
1
Answer:
48% it is matching. I HOPE IT IS CORRECT
Explanation:
yes, since his income is below the prescribed limit, and he does not own multiple house properties. Since the second property that Parvez bought is not a house property, but a commercial property, he cannot be said to own multiple house properties, which would have made him ineligible to use ITR Forms 1 and 4
Similar questions