Question

please answer it.......

Answer 1

India has always been hot bed for issues it is super Shiny one on one side and Supergirl on the other side it managers to capture the world glands and varied aspects but visionary have been watched it grow under the hands of Huge names and they have been guessing for a long time for future and still I personally and a little help for the Goldman Sachs paper here are some my list of Areas where India should be focused on 64 years from independent show the dream vision India's Pride life having the longest and the most detailed constitution of the world also contemplated the various sect seen here in it is sure as a huge law book on the other hand the government is not up to the norms governance problem step for the increasing inability to deliver public services in the face of rising Expectations couple with the lack of political will India is a huge Block with several district sections by decentralization provision of public services the government can build responsibilities across governament to create checks and balances the use of Grey transparency and information can allow more accountability and increase citizen voice in a shairing good governance Cds and do not organised to demand better services only on community to approach Candy massive law that stands do so late

Answer 2

When confronting the question of development, village people will always sense the specter of future change hanging with a dark and heavy presence over their lives. Whatever arguments might be made in favor of development, it always entails the passage from the familiar and tested to the new and unknown. Most people in most countries, from one historical period to another, probably would have preferred to be left alone to live out their lives surrounded by the familiar.

There is no reason to believe that Micronesia is different from any other traditional society in this respect. Yet, the people of FSM are being told that they must be willing parties to a pattern of development that means inevitable changes for them and their children. The economic future of their island nation depends on their willingness to develop a productive economy that can underwrite the public services they will need in the years ahead, they are told. It is assumed that they have already become habituated to these services and the standard of living that a partially monetized economy has made possible.

Yet, they cannot escape the responsibility of having to make a fundamental choice between preservation of the traditional ways and moving toward a more secure niche in the modern global economy. What some development theorists call "the cruel dilemma" persists. By opting for faster economic growth, people implicitly accept a course that will inevitably lead to great social change in their homeland. Failure to acknowledge this in development planning only compounds the problem by adding "cruel deception" to the "cruel dilemma".

Development and traditional folkways almost always clash, in practice if not in theory. If there are any doubts on this clash, one need only recall the impact of monetization on Micronesia, the effects of which are felt in every sphere of life today. Economic development as it occurred during the last 30 years in Micronesia uprooted venerable structures, forever changed the shape of the family, and altered some of the basic values of island society.

Must development always lead to this kind of upheaval? It will always mean social change of some degree, but the magnitude of the change will depend in great part on the pace of the development program and the strategies employed. Slow-paced change can be absorbed far more easily and with less serious social disruption, especially when accompanied by an understanding of what is happening to the society and why. Emphasis on sustainability in development is helpful not only in looking to environmental needs but in putting the brakes on speedy development projects that might have deleterious social effects. A process of change that proceeds from the grassroots level upward will cushion the inevitable shocks of change and better prepare communities to deal with its social impact. Moreover, anxiety over the future is diminished to the extent that local institutions--community organizations and chiefly authority, for example--are used as the vehicles of change.

In the end, however, there is no painless economic development. All development, even moderately paced and culturally sensitive, comes with a price tag attached. Unless we understand this, we run the risk of failing to adopt appropriate strategies for development goals.