Please answer my question it is easy and the red coloured line is nothing.
The question is in the picture.
It is about the examinations of school.
The one who will give the correct answer I will mark him/ her as a brainlist it is my promise.
Answers
Answer:
For certain undergrad classes, I assign a take-home exam, rather than the more familiar in-class exam. When I distribute the exam, I remind the students that this is an individual exam, and that they may not work in groups, and then I add "Believe me, I can tell when you cheat". This, however, is a bluff. Unless it is superobvious, I can't tell if students work together; I only tell them I can to scare them into honoring the rules.
Are there any ways, other than lying to the students, to prevent (or at least minimize) this type of cheating in take-home exams?
It is very disheartening to a teacher to find that his/her students are cheating, but they probably are. Today, cheating is one of the realities of the educational scene. If the students spent more time on studying than figuring out how to cheat, teachers would see more satisfactory performance profiles. Cheating is primarily relative and is culture specific. When I was in America, the students did not cheat even when there were no proctors around. Nonetheless, teachers should leave no stone unturned when it comes to cheating. In point of fact, there are certain things teachers can do to lessen cheating. For instance, teachers should learn about their students and the ways they might cheat and change how they test. They should develop a clear examination policy of rules telling students in advance – whether cheating on the test will lead to points off the test, a zero, or a letter home. Finally, teachers should develop multiple versions of the same test to make it more difficult for the students to cheat because they will not be able to copy the learner sitting next to them.