Math, asked by polavarapuleela, 3 months ago

please answer this question

Attachments:

Answers

Answered by Rupeskhumar

1

Answer:

B IS THE ANSWER BELIEVE ME

Answered by gaurivarshney

0

Answer:

b - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

=> (x-1) × (1-2x)

=> x-2x^2 -1+2x

=> -2x^2+3x-2

Here , coefficient of x is 3 . Hope you'll understand. Please give me thanks and mark me as brainliast .

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

Math, 1 month ago

3 bells at an interval of 4,7,14 minute all three bells rang at 6 a.m when the three bells will ring together ...

Science, 1 month ago

A ball of mass 5 g is thrown up with a velocity and it reaches a height of 10 m . What is the velocity with which it was thrown up ? please Ans it faster the correct answer will mark as brainliest...

Science, 1 month ago

tick the odd one out. compound microscope, projector, telescope, magnifying glass and concave lens please answer ...

English, 3 months ago

give the meaning of proper...

English, 3 months ago

What is leakage current...

Physics, 9 months ago

An electric field of magnitude 1000 NC−1 is produced between two parallel plates with a separation of 2.0 cm, as shown in the figure. (a) What is the potential difference between the plates? (b) With what minimum speed should an electron be projected from the lower place in the direction of the field, so that it may reach the upper plate? (c) Suppose the electron is projected from the lower place...

Physics, 9 months ago

A uniform field of 2.0 NC−1 exists in space in the x-direction. (a) Taking the potential at the origin to be zero, write an expression for the potential at a general point (x, y, z). (b) At which point, the potential is 25 V? (c) If the potential at the origin is taken to be 100 V, what will be the expression for the potential at a general point? (d) What will be the potential at the origin if...

Physics, 9 months ago

How much work has to be done in assembling three charged particles at the vertices of an equilateral triangle, as shown in the figure? Figure...