Please answer this question below ...
Question no. 9 ...??
Attachments:
Answers
Answered by
2
Hello,
This question is solved using Euclid's Division Lemma.
In this we used the consequence of lemma that is
0 < or = remainder < divisor.
So,
If we have divisor as 4 then the remainder will be either 0 or 1 or 2 or 3. But not 4.
So,
A number can be expressed in the form of a or using division lemma. That is
Dividend = divisor * quotient + remainder.
Please refer to the above photo for the used process.
Hope this will be helping you...
This question is solved using Euclid's Division Lemma.
In this we used the consequence of lemma that is
0 < or = remainder < divisor.
So,
If we have divisor as 4 then the remainder will be either 0 or 1 or 2 or 3. But not 4.
So,
A number can be expressed in the form of a or using division lemma. That is
Dividend = divisor * quotient + remainder.
Please refer to the above photo for the used process.
Hope this will be helping you...
Attachments:
Pranav1811:
Thanks , actually I was confused over (4q+3) , since it was not divisible of 4 ....but now confusion is clear ....! Thanks again
Similar questions