Please answer this question. Don't copy from net.
but please help me.
Attachments:
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
I wrote the answer earlier but couldnt send it why IDK Take the answer again
1.It is because the farmer can only afford to build a well instead of a canal
2.It is more easy for the farmer to use a well because it is a simple machine as compared to a canal.
Hope it helps you
I am on the leaderboard yay!!
#bebrainlycat
Answered by
1
Answer:-
- Well is simplest and cost effective source of irrigation and the poor Indian farmer can easily afford it.
- Well is an independent source of irrigation and can be used as and when the necessity arises.
- In canal irrigation farmers has to pay regularly , but wells are their own property.
- It is more reliable during periods of famine when surface water dries up.
NON - COPIED ANSWER
Hope it helps u :)
plz mrk me the brainliest
||MrCuteKing||
Similar questions