History, asked by sahanagh5884, 8 months ago

Please help fast!!!
PHOENIX, Sept. 20, 2012—Arizona's new immigration law takes effect this week. According to the law, police officers must check the status of anyone who may be an undocumented immigrant. Officers have the right to decide who is checked under this law. Which argument would an opponent of this law use to show that the law is unjustified? All citizens are entitled to due process of law under the Ninth Amendment. The First Amendment permits freedom of assembly by all people, including immigrants. These checks may be considered unreasonable searches under the Fourth Amendment. The U.S. Constitution sets up a process for immigrants to establish citizenship.

Answers

Answered by manishaacin
8

Answer:

The lawyers probably would look up cases fo Freedom from unreasonable searches

The freedom is guaranteed within the fourth amendments, which states that   'The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; 

This law make every law enforcments that fail to provide actual reason to conduct searches (such as no violation or no warranties) could be punished either with suspension or even jail time

Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/7356178#readmore

Answered by datboycash11
1

Answer: The answer is C:These checks may be considered unreasonable searches under the Fourth Amendment.

Explanation: I got it right one the test.

Similar questions