Please solve these questions.. Solve it fast .
Answers
1.Lack of power sharing between the two group and lack of adequate representation and accommodation of interest is of the Tamil lead to Civil War .The Sinhala community establishes its Supremacy by pursuing the policy of the majoritarianism and by adopting various measures .
2.The Belgium leaders amended the constitution four times so as to work out an arrangement that would enable everyone to live together within raw country. The Belgium administration adopted at different ways. They understand the permanence of geographical heterogeneity and social diversity .
3.Community government is an elected body by people belonging to one language, one culture or any common property no matter where they live. This government has the power regarding cultural and educational and language related issues .
4.Prudential is define as involving or share showing care and for thought, especially in business .
5.Difference between prudential and moral is :
.Prudential :
Prudential reason stress that power sharing will bring out better outcome .
.Moral :
Moral reason emphaise the very act of power sharing as valuable .
6.Term democracy first appeared in ancient Greek political and philosophical thought in city - state of Athes. During , classical autiquity .The word comes from demos " common people " and kratos " strength " led by Cleisthenes , Altenians established what is general led at the first democracy in 508 - 507 BC.
7.When power is shared between organs of government that is legislative , executive, Judiciary and placed them at equal place to exercise different power is called horizontal distribution of power .in this one organ can interpret in other organs if they misuse the power .
8.A system that allows each branch of government to amend or act of another branch so as to prevent any one branch from exerting too much power.
9.You should check on the google or on map.
10.Sinhala and Tamil are the languages which are mostly spoken in the Siri Lanka . After independence , sinhalase followed several majoritarian . sinhala was recoganised as the official language of siri lanka in 1956.now both Sinhala and Tamil are the official languages of the Sri Lanka .
11. The majortarian measures taken in siri lanka to establish sinhala suoermacy are : ( i ) In 1956 an Act was passed to recognise Sinhala as official language thus disregarding Tamil . (ii) University positions and government jobs favoured Sinhala applicants .
12.(i)Belgium method of power sharing :
1.They adopted the policy of power sharing .
2.They have equal powers to all the communities .....minor or major does not matter .
3. It solved the problem .
(ii)Sinhala method of power sharing :
1.Adopted the policy of majoritariosm.
2.They give preferences to the maturity Sinhala group alone disregarding the minority.
3. It only increased the problem.
13.The constitution of Belgium was amended four times .This is because the Belgian leaders cooker different path by recognising the existence of regional differences and cultural diversities of the country . Between the 1970 and 1933 ,Belgian government amended their constitution 4 times .
14.(i)Prudential reason :
Power sharing helps in reducing the conflict between the various social groups hence it is necessary for maintaining social harmony and peace .
(ii)Moral reason :
The avoiding conflict in the society and preventing majority are considered as the Prudential reasons of the power sharing .
Hope it helps you please mark it as a barinlist.....!!!!!
Answer:
The general problem raised here is peasant involvement in Afro‐Asian nationalist movements. As a case study the focus is M. K. Gandhi's attitude to and activities among Indian peasants from 1917 to 1922 and their response, firstly to his broad span of rural work for social reform and the rectification of particular peasant grievances, and then to his India‐wide passive resistance campaigns on continental issues which had no specifically rural appeal. This analysis underlines the fact that ‘India's peasants’ were no monolithic group. They differed from area to area in economic and social position and were further fragmented by the ties of religion, tribe and caste. Consequently the nature and range of their wider public awareness varied, and their relationships with Gandhi were diverse and complicated. In certain areas he attracted wide support, even adulation, particularly where he campaigned on local grievances. But peasant response to his all‐India calls for passive resistance was geographically restricted, and often dependent on a very garbled understanding of the issues at stake and the expected pay‐offs of the movement. Peasant activists were often outside Gandhi's control; and this threat to cohesion and discipline made him very ambivalent towards wide rural participation. His relationship with India's peasantry illustrated the problems any continental leader or organisation faced in trying to accommodate ‘national’ appeals and tactics to the diverse and often specifically local needs of rural groups — an accommodation which was difficult, dangerous yet essential in some degree if nationalist movements were to be broadly based.
Explanation:
i have given