Question

please solve this please ​

Answer 1

Answer:

daughter, book, kite, door, water, doll

Answer 2

Answer:

There was no imminent danger to X as the dog stopped barking and was walking with the owner. Hence, shooting it amounted to excessive use of the right of private defence and hence liable for killing the dog.

There was no imminent danger to X as the dog stopped barking and was walking with the owner. Hence, shooting it amounted to excessive use of the right of private defence and hence liable for killing the dog.  

Section 96 to 106 of IPC deals with the right of an individual to private defence but in this case there's no danger to X from dog as dog stopped barking so the owner of dog can sue to X .

Explanation: