Pls help me with my essay?
(In 250 words)
Topic:“There can be moral virtue without intellectual virtue”.
Answers
Answer:
Hey mate here is your answer
Moral Virtue And Intellectual Virtue
Introduction
This is a layman’s effort to hit the importance of Aristotle’s explanation of the human nature. In his work of sociology and ethics; the Nicomachean Ethics Book 1, he emerge as a good natured and cheerful philosopher. He is an icon in his writing and shows his skilled and a vast experience in writing since he entices many people to look into ethics. From my point of view Nicomachean Ethics is a philosophical that reviews the nature of the good life for a human being. He begins the work by suggesting that there is often an ultimate goodness in every last analysis that all human actions ultimately aim. Happiness is the principle of actions and the cause of all good things. It is thus worthy of honor (Aristotle and Nadia, p34, 2007). The most important characteristics of the ultimate good are final, self-sufficient, complete and continuous.
In Book VIII Aristotle argues that for a friendship to be firm and constructive it must be based upon goodness. In this book he argues about two controversial premises that is; long term and short term relationship. According to Aristotle justice and friendship are two things that are closely related because for justice to rule citizens must be connected by friendship. In conclusion Aristotle advocates a life with as much contemplation as possible. Since by doing good things make people happy and normal thoughts remain to be highest good. This essay will study the strength of these objections in order and then show them to be mistaken, thus supporting Aristotle's general conclusion (Aristotle and Taylor, p67, 2006).
Objectors to Key Premises
Aristotle’s critics can oppose to the good toward of all human actions indirectly or directly aim is happiness or flourishing that Aristotle refers as eudaimonia in Greek language. The objectors think that Aristotle’s theory of the good life doesn’t hold universally. However the essay will proves that Aristotle work was good natured and it is based on real facts. According to Nicomachean Ethics happiness can implies three situations (a) it implies that it is desired for the sake of anything else, (b) that it is desired for itself, and (c) that it is stable and satisfies all desire. The above is Critical reading of premise so that we have an idea of what are the right virtues in Book II Aristotle suggests that there are two kinds of virtue that is moral and intellectual. He says that we learn moral virtues by continuous practice and habit while intellectual virtues are by instructions.
According to Aristotle happiness consists of several things. He approaches such a question with several answers, first he said happiness in animals and plants lies upon their natures. He said difference between animals and plants is that animals consists in reasoning as well as acting accordance with their reason in their function, while animal cant. The following is a short list of surface objections, Complainers might oppose idea that human soul is alienated into different parts, governing (reasoning) part, part that is governed by reasons and lastly unresponsive part to reason and say that is flawed (Aristotle and Nadia, p67, 2007). But the virtues are habit of the soul by which a person works well.
How the surface objections really expose deep problems.
The objectors get into deep problems as they try to oppose about virtues because one becomes vicious by permitting certain defective ways of acting to be habitual. According Aristotle virtue is hard to achieve since if people simply follow our feelings it is easier to become vicious. Even though people have a natural desire for happiness, our inherited feelings regularly lead us away from our true happiness. Therefore the virtues make human life valuable hence we should value virtues because they show us a preferable path to happiness (Aristotle and Taylor, p137, 2006).
Replies to the Objections
In the first instance, if there are virtues and values that people worth living for are those concerning feelings and passions these are the key issues that objectors should consider. Most people recognize virtues that concerns social life and justice this is because it enhances friendship and good relationship. People’s main action and most wide-ranging happiness is a life of observation of the highest goods. Where natural justice is always just in all times and places. By doing this will enhance friendship and forever be sharing goodness. Hence friendship improves experience of realizing each other toward their final goals and human excellence that discusses deep happiness (Aristotle and Taylor, p78, 2006). Therefore if this is not considered there would be massive deep problems in socializing hence living with others.
Explanation: