PLZ ANS THIS QUES I HAVE A DEBATE ON WHY LOCKDOWN SHOULD NOT EXTEND IT SHOULD BE A SPEECH IN 300 WORDS IF YOU ANS I WILL VOTE, THANK, AND MARK YOU THE BRANLIEST I REQUEST YOU PLZ ANS THE QUES. IT IS OF 6 POINTS
Answers
Answer:
must stop
June 16, 2020, 5:11 PM IST Purushottam Jha in Beyond the Fact | India, politics | TOI
While pandemic infections and fatalities are disturbingly soaring with studies and experts apprehending numbers to be picking up to new heights in coming days and months, there are media spaces being filled in with the debate of efficacy, relevance and – more predominantly – of the futility of lockdown in the country. Two points are prominently discussed, rather alleged – One, the lockdown was unnecessary and could have been avoided and Two, Narendra Modi utterly failed and, therefore, later abandoned the pandemic midway leaving it up to the states to handle and take the blame of the failures and of the consequences thereof. Many examples of many countries are cited to prove the point that the idea was ill conceived and ill-advised and was mainly aimed at Modi’s own PR exercise which he is often used to and which in this case backfired and boomeranged, that Modi’s credibility has drastically come down and his ‘so called popularity’ had a bitter blow and more importantly the ‘poor and the youth’ who had been madly in love with him are now ‘completely disillusioned’ about him. It is also put out to people that Narendra Modi did assure to win over the virus in eighteen days or twenty-one days when he came to address people commencing the lockdown – and he miserably failed as the pandemic pick up more speed instead of stopping there or even slowing down. The miseries of migrant workers too is attributed to the decision of ‘sudden lockdown’.
hope this help.
and i am telling u i serched it in google
Answer:
Here is the answer! Hope it helps!!!!!
Explanation:
https://www.republicworld.com/the-debate/1563/4515/should-the-lockdown-be-extended.html
THIS IS THE LINK TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND MORE