Question

plz fast and short
Answer the following questions:
1 In how many periods have the historians divided history?

2Write about them briefly
Why were the British interested in preserving official documents?

3What are the literary sources for the modern period? Write a note on time in history

4Explain why historians find it easier to draw conclusions about the modern period than
about earlier periods.

5Why do interpretations differ in history? Give an example to support your answer.​

Answer 1

Answer:

a.3 periods see the attachment also.

b. because according to them for being recognised in the world after their death also that is the only option.

c.One of the most primary sources of modern Indian history is the official records of the British colonial administration in India. The culture of memos, notings and reports preserved by the British has come to be seen as an authentic source of Indian historiography..

d.Also, people from different status didn't concluded same, at times different/clashing conclusions are made. But in the modern era, records are kept properly on paper and internet. So, it is easier to conclude about the modern period than in the earlier period.

e.We may give example of how British classified Indian history into Hindu, Muslim and the British period, contrary to some another classification that is Ancient, mediaeval and the British or colonial as referred by some historians. f. Time period in which historians write also impact the interpretation.

Hope it's helpful to you

please mark my answer as the brainiest answer and follow me