Point out any 2 difference between Power sharing arrangements adopted in Belgium and srilanka
Answers
Answered by
1
Explanation:
hope you got your answer ☺️
please mark me brainliest
Attachments:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a3fb/2a3fb272ec5a73a199bdd48702b239c2ce2605af" alt=""
Answered by
0
The power sharing arrangement adopted in Belgium and Srilanka is centered around the linguistic lines yet the difference between two arises on the basis of recognition and treatment of such linguistic groups.
Explanation:
- In Srilanka, the government failed to recognize the Tamil speaking population and passed an law which the Sinhala community imposed their will on the Tamil speaking people.
- The Tamil people who constitute the minority, were left baffled as the government, dominated by Sinhala speaking people, recognized Sinhala as the only Language by overshadowing the Tamil. Thus it took the shape of majoritarianism and resulted into a Civil war.
- On the other hand, Belgium, after coming across the various regional and cultural differences in the country, amended its constitution in such a way as to let all three different linguistic groups, French, Dutch and German speaking population, accommodate and live peacefully in the same country thus giving an equal treatment to all groups.
- The role of community government and giving each linguistic group an equal say in center and state respectively helped secure peace in the region.
Similar questions