popular governments can be undemocratic and popular leaders can be autocratic. explain the statement by citing example of zimbabwe ?
Answers
Answered by
11
hey dear ,
■■here is your answer, ■■
●●●●●●●●●●●●●
Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, has been ruling the country since independence. Elections have been held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe is popular but also uses unfair practices in elections. Hence, we see that popular governments can be undemocratic.
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
HOPE IT HELPS U
cheers ☺☺
■■here is your answer, ■■
●●●●●●●●●●●●●
Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, has been ruling the country since independence. Elections have been held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe is popular but also uses unfair practices in elections. Hence, we see that popular governments can be undemocratic.
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
HOPE IT HELPS U
cheers ☺☺
Shreya1104:
can you please explain the statement
Answered by
4
꧁❀Aɴsᴡᴇʀ❀꧂
➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪
1) Zimbabwe attained independence in 1980. Since then, the country has been ruled by ZANU - PF party and it's leader Robert Mugabe.
2) Elections have been held regularly and always won by ZANU - PF.
3) President Mugabe has designed the constitution in such a way which gave him more powers.
4) There was no freedom for opposition party workers and public meetings, demonstrations, etc. were declared illegal.
5) There was no independence of newspapers and the media was fully controlled by the government.
6) This shows that popular governments can be undemocratic and popular leaders can be autocratic.
➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪➪
Similar questions