Social Sciences, asked by namra83, 1 year ago

ppt on the topic narmada andolan ​

Answers

Answered by SHEILD98
0

Answer:  Narmada Bachao Andolan is social movementconsisting of tribal people, adivasis, farmers, environmentalists and human rights activists against the Sardar Sarovar Dam being built across the Narmada river, Gujarat, India.Backgroundy Post-1947, investigations were carried out to evaluate mechanisms in utilizing water from the Narmada river .which flows into the Arabian Sea after passing through the states of Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Maharashtra. Due to inter-state differences in implementing schemes and sharing of water, the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal was constituted by the Government of India on October 6, 1969 to adjudicate over the water disputes. This Tribunal investigated the matters referred to it and responded after more than 10 years. On December 12, 1979, the decision as given by the Tribunal, with all the parties at dispute binding to it, was released by the Indian Government. y As per the Tribunal's decision, 30 major, 135 medium, and 3000 small dams, were granted approval for construction including raising the height of the Sardar Sarovar damy In 1985, after hearing about the Sardar Sarovar dam, Medha Patkar and her colleagues visited the project site and noticed the project work being shelved due to an order by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. y The reasons for this was cited as "non-fulfillment of basic environmental conditions and the lack of completion of crucial studies and plans". y What she noticed was that the people who were going to be affected were given no information, but for the offer for rehabilitation. Due to this, the villagers had many questions right from why their permission was not taken to whether a good assessment on the ensuing destruction was taken.y Furthermore, the officials related to the project had no answers to their questions. While World Bank, the financing agency for this project, came into the picture, Patkar approached the Ministry of Environment to seek clarifications. She realized, after seeking answers from the ministry, that the project was not sanctioned at all, and wondered as to how funds were even sanctioned by the World Bank. After several studies, they realized that the officials had overlooked the post-project problems. y Through Patkar's channel of communication between the government and the residents, she provided critiques to the project authorities and the governments involved. At the same time, her group realized that all those displaced were only given compensation for the immediate standing crop and not for displacement and rehabilitation.y As Patkar remained immersed in the Narmadastruggle, she chose to quit her Ph. D. studies and focus entirely on the Narmada activity. y Thereafter, she organized a 36-day long, solidarity march among the neighboring states of the Narmada valley from Madhya Pradesh to the Sardar Sarovar dam site. y She said that the march was "a path symbolizing the long path of struggle .This march was resisted by the police, who according to Patkar were "caning the marchers and arresting them and tearing the clothes off women activists".y In 1991, her actions led to an unprecedented independent review yyyyby the World Bank. The Morse Commission, appointed in June 1991 at the recommendation of The World Bank President Barber Coinable, conducted its first independent review of a World Bank project. This independent review stated that "performance under these projects has fallen short of what is called for under Bank policies and guidelines and the policies of the Government of India. This resulted in the Indian Government pulling out of its loan agreement with the World Bank.In response, Patkar said "It is very clear and obvious that they used this as a face-saving device", suggesting that if this were not to happen, the World Bank would eventually would have withdrawn the loan. The World Bank's participation in these projects was eventually cancelled in 1995.Supreme Court's decisiony Patkar led Narmada Bachao Andolan had filed a written petition withthe Supreme Court of India, the nation's apex court, seeking stoppage of construction on the Sardar Sarovar dam. The court initially ruled the decision in the Andolan's favor thereby effecting an immediate stoppage of work at the dam and directing the concerned states to first complete the rehabilitation and replacement process.y The Supreme Court also deliberated on this issue further for severalyears but finally upheld the Tribunal Award and allowed the construction to proceed, subject to conditions.

Explanation:

Similar questions