President’s rule can be imposed in a State if the government is not being run according to the provisions of the Constitution. State whether any of the following conditions are a fit case for imposition of President’s rule in the State. Give reasons. √ two members of the State legislative assembly belonging to the main opposition party have been killed by criminals and the opposition is demanding dismissal of the State government. √ Kidnapping of young children for ransom is on rise. The number of crimes against women are increasing. √ No political party has secured majority in the recent elections of the State Legislative Assembly. It is feared that some MLAs from the other parties may be lured to support a political party in return for money. √ Different political parties are ruling in the State and at the centre and they are bitter opponents of each other. √ More than 2000 people have been killed in the communal riots. √ In the water dispute between the two States, one State government refused to follow the decision of the Supreme Court.
Answers
The explanation is.
Explanation:
1) No, we can not remove state government if any opposition takes action and kills the active members of the state of the government.
These actions are taken with the help of laws.
2) No, we can not say that if there is being kidnapping and some crimes were performed against the women that the laws are not strong enough.
Obviously they are not, as these things don't prove that the constitutions are weak.
3) Legislative assembly should always first prove their self on the platform before claiming that they can do that thing better for the society.
4) President's rule can not be applied to the criteria of how different political parties are performing against the opponents.
5) The stage where the president should change the rules is when the parries are failing to perform their tasks.
6) Yes, If parties are refusing to follow the constitutional laws then we should apply the president's laws as soon as possible.