Product of three different positive integers is 144 what is the maximum possible sum of these integers
Answers
Answered by
11
Algebraically speaking, this is tricky. But not too much. Normally, to reduce a system of equations with n unknowns, you need at least n # equations. We have two:
...
x * y * z = 144
x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 149
...
We also have the condition that x, y, and z are all positive integers. This helps.
...
The problem wants us to find the sum of x + y + z
...
This can be solved with logic and reasoning, and some trial and error. I used an MS Excel spreadsheet to speed up the calculations (so I could focus on the logic), but you could do it just as easily with pencil and paper.
...
The easiest place to start is with the products of x * y * z = 144
...
144 = 12^2
...
If we only had two integers to multiply, starting with 12 * 12 is a great start. But we have three. So, factoring 12 and something like 3 * 4 * 12 makes a good guess.
...
This gets us x * y * z = 144 okay, but not the sum of the squares:
...
3^2 + 4^2 + 12^2 = 169, which is greater than the 149 we are looking for. But that gives us another clue:
...
Keeping under the sum of squares constraint with an integer as large as 12 is probably impossible. So, we are narrowing down the possible solutions.
...
Next tactic, factor 144:
...
1, 144
...
x * y * z = 144
x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 149
...
We also have the condition that x, y, and z are all positive integers. This helps.
...
The problem wants us to find the sum of x + y + z
...
This can be solved with logic and reasoning, and some trial and error. I used an MS Excel spreadsheet to speed up the calculations (so I could focus on the logic), but you could do it just as easily with pencil and paper.
...
The easiest place to start is with the products of x * y * z = 144
...
144 = 12^2
...
If we only had two integers to multiply, starting with 12 * 12 is a great start. But we have three. So, factoring 12 and something like 3 * 4 * 12 makes a good guess.
...
This gets us x * y * z = 144 okay, but not the sum of the squares:
...
3^2 + 4^2 + 12^2 = 169, which is greater than the 149 we are looking for. But that gives us another clue:
...
Keeping under the sum of squares constraint with an integer as large as 12 is probably impossible. So, we are narrowing down the possible solutions.
...
Next tactic, factor 144:
...
1, 144
Answered by
0
Answer:
ttyytttt5ttfddfgghhhhhhhhhjjhhggf
Similar questions