Math, asked by bhaskarkushwah1683, 8 months ago

Prove that absolute convergence implies convergence converse is not true

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
2

Answer:

Theorem: Absolute Convergence implies Convergence

Theorem: Absolute Convergence implies ConvergenceHence the sequence of regular partial sums {Sn} is Cauchy and therefore must converge (compare this proof with the Cauchy Criterion for Series). The converse is not true because the series converges, but the corresponding series of absolute values does not converge.

Answered by AneesKakar
0

To find,

Prove that absolute convergence implies convergence converse is not true.

Solution,

Suppose ∑^∞ _n=1 a_n  is absolutely convergent. Let

T_j = |a_1| + |a_2| + ... + |a_j|

be the sequence of partial sums of absolute values, and

S_j = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_j

be the "regular" sequence of partial sums. Since the series converges absolutely, there exists an integer N such that:

| T_n - T_m| = |a_n| + |a_{n-1}| + ... + |a_{m+2}| + |a_{m+1}| < ∞

if n > m > N. But we have by the triangle inequality that

| S_n - S_{ml} = | a_n + a_{n-1} + ... a_{m+1} | ≤ |a_n| + |a_{n-1}| + ... |a_{m+1}| = | T_n - T_m | < ∞

Hence the sequence of regular partial sums {S_n} is Cauchy and therefore must converge (compare this proof with the Cauchy Criterion for Series).

The converse is not true because the series ∑^∞ _n=1  \frac{-(1)^{n+1}}{n} converges, but the corresponding series of absolute values ∑^∞ _n=1 1/n do not converge.

#SPJ3

Similar questions