Question

Pulakesin II was king of Bihar. State whether the statement is True (or) False. And Justify it

Answer 1

no he was the ruler of chalukaya dynasty

Answer 2

The given statement is false, that Pulakesin II wasn't the king of Bihar.

Explanation:

• The statement that suggests Pulakesin II as the king of the state of Bihar was false as historians have rightfully recorded Pulakesin II was the ruler or the King of the chalukayan dynasty.
• India is an ancient country over the years have been separated by districts and states each being ruled by one king of one dynasty to the other.