Social Sciences, asked by TbiaSupreme, 1 year ago

Pulakesin II was king of Bihar. State whether the statement is True (or) False. And Justify it

Answers

Answered by komalsingh64

0

no he was the ruler of chalukaya dynasty

tiger2375: Hii

Answered by kingofself

0

The given statement is false, that Pulakesin II wasn't the king of Bihar.

Explanation:

The statement that suggests Pulakesin II as the king of the state of Bihar was false as historians have rightfully recorded Pulakesin II was the ruler or the King of the chalukayan dynasty.
India is an ancient country over the years have been separated by districts and states each being ruled by one king of one dynasty to the other.

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

Math, 7 months ago

Please help me with working it out.

Science, 7 months ago

in a Mandolin cross tall plants with purple flowers were crossed with graphql and with white flowers how would you denote : i)the genotype of two parents ii)the genotype and phenotype of f1 progeny iii)the result obtained by selfing f1 progeny to get f2 progeny.give the ratio obtained in f2 progeny draw it please me i am sandra...

Hindi, 7 months ago

bache ta kehda hath buri tara fasiya pya si? (Punjabi)...

Math, 1 year ago

Find the angle whose supplementry angle is 4 times its complementary angle?

Social Sciences, 1 year ago

Harshavardhana ascended the throne in 606 A.D. State whether the statement is True (or) False. And Justify it...

English, 1 year ago

What did patol babu remember when he got the proposal to act in a film?

History, 1 year ago

But the first segment of the Key to Time isn't there either. You wouldn't want to de sometng of value in that furnace. No, the fragment would be on a planet that's calm and cold. Can you tnk of any planets Where's the Key to Time?!in your Solar System that fit the bill?

English, 1 year ago

Write a letter to your friend advising m to celebrate ts Diwali without crackers.