PUS is interested in publishing-
Answers
Answer:
yes I know this answer
Explanation:
Manuscript Submission Guidelines:
Manuscript Submission Guidelines: Public Understanding of Science
This Journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics.
This Journal recommends that authors follow the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals formulated by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
Please read the guidelines below then visit the Journal’s submission site https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pscience to upload your manuscript. Please note that manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines may be returned.
Only manuscripts of sufficient quality that meet the aims and scope of Public Understanding of Science will be reviewed.
There are no fees payable to submit or publish in this journal.
As part of the submission process you will be required to warrant that you are submitting your original work, that you have the rights in the work, and that you have obtained and can supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you, that you are submitting the work for first publication in the Journal and that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and has not already been published elsewhere. Please see our guidelines on prior publication and note that Public Understanding of Science may accept submissions of papers that have been posted on pre-print servers; please alert the Editorial Office when submitting (contact details are at the end of these guidelines) and include the DOI for the preprint in the designated field in the manuscript submission system. Authors should not post an updated version of their paper on the preprint server while it is being peer reviewed for possible publication in the journal. If the article is accepted for publication, the author may re-use their work according to the journal's author archiving policy.
If your paper is accepted, you must include a link on your preprint to the final version of your paper.
Answer:
ExplaP U Public Understanding of Science2020, Publishing about the coronavirus pandemic in PUSCurrently, thousands of our colleagues worldwide turn their attention to the coronavirus pandemic. Many studies are already under way or will be launched soon that fit the aims and scope of Public Understanding of Science—that is, the interrelationship between science and the public in its many facets. PUS is interested in publishing research articles, essays and practical perspectives that ana-lyze that relationship in times of crisis and draw substantiated conclusions for theory, research, and risk management.While we are very interested in corona-related articles, we still consider only those for publica-tion that fit our aims and scope. Yet, the list of relevant corona-related topics is almost endless. In the very first issue of PUS in January 1992, Steven Shapin called for more public understanding of “science-in-the-making.” The current coronavirus crisis is actually a field laboratory to study science as process of knowledge construction in the public eye—exposing uncertainties, conflicting views, scientific advice changing over time, and the interrelation of science and policy-making. Moreover, corona-related studies could be analyses of science in society, medialization of science, and co-production of knowledge. Besides these constructivist perspectives, public communication of and about scientific expertise as well as its reception and use (or disregard) by citizens for their risk assessments, coping behaviors, and perceptions of science are relevant topics for PUS.We have been asked whether we would speed-up processing and publication of corona-crisis related submissions and offer a “fast track” option. Understandably, authors are interested in quick publication—in particular as early publications may have a particularly high chance of being cited. Readers, too, may be interested in topical articles. Yet, careful studies as well as a careful review process require time. Retractions in the biomedical field, where the pressure of understanding the spread of the virus and finding a vaccine is more urgent, have demonstrated the risk of speeding up established routines. So far, we have not modified our routines for corona-related submissions. However, we keep a close eye on those submissions. If we believe that an article has immediate consequences for risk communication, or if we consider an article crucially important for colleagues working on the same topic, we would make extra efforts to accelerate publication.Those who want to share findings, analyses, and comments quickly, can do so in our blog. Several colleagues have already posted findings and insights related to the coronavirus crisis. Publishing in our blog would not preclude the use of the same data or arguments in a regular article submitted later. We also accept sharing of manuscripts via preprint servers prior to submission.Our interest in corona-related articles will not quickly fade. We look forward to manuscript submissions and special issue proposals not only in the short run but also in the forthcoming years.