Question

Q.4. Read the following passage and answer the questions.
The writings of Indian historians who were trained in the
British educational system show an inclination to restore the
pride in the ancient glory of India and the self-esteem of the
Indian readers. Their writings are known as 'Nationalistic
Historiography'. Nationalistic writings in Maharashtra were
inspired by Vishnushastri Chiplunkar. He criticised the
prejudiced history of ancient India written by British officers.
The nationalistic historians tried to seek the golden era of
Indian history. They are at times blamed for ignoring the
critical analysis of the historical truth.
1) What was the tendency of nationalist historians?
2) Find the odd man out giving reasons:
Vishnushastri Chiplunkar, Vinayak D. Savarkar, V.K. Rajwade,
Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar.
3) How is nationalistic historiography different from colonial
historiography ?​

Answer 1

Answer:

1 Historiography is the study of how history is written. One pervasive influence upon the writing of history has been nationalism, a set of beliefs about political legitimacy and cultural identity. Nationalism has provided a significant framework for historical writing in Europe and in those former colonies influenced by Europe since the nineteenth century. According to the medieval historian Patrick J. Geary:

Explanation:

justice for Sushant bhaiya ❣️❣️

Answer 2

Answer: 1) The nationalistic historians tried to seek the golden era of Indian history

2) Vishnu Shastri chiplunkar

Explanation: