Q.6.A. Write a short notes. (Any 3)
1. Khilafat movement
3. UNICEF
2. WHO
4. IFO
5. Satyagraha
Answers
Answer:
"KHILAFAT MOVEMENT"
in 1920 the British imposed a harsh treaty on the Turkish Sultan or Khalifa. people were furious about this as they had been about the jallianwala massacre. Also Indian Muslims were keen that the Khalifa be allowed to retain control over Muslim scared places in the erstwhile ottoman empire. The leaders of the khilafat agitation, Mohammad Ali and shaukat Ali, now wished to initiate a full fledged Non cooperation movement. Gandhiji supported their call and urged the Congress to campaign against " Punjab wrongs" (Jallianwala massacre), the Khilafat wrong and demand Swaraj....
All the best!
Explanation:
Khilafat movement
Khilafat movement was led by two brothers Shaukat Ali and Mohammed Ali, was founded to fight for khilafat right ,and was against the harsh treatment given to the Khalifa emperor of the Turkish Empire , after the first world war.
Gandhiji convinced the Congress to join hands with the Khilafat movement and start a non cooperation campaign for Swaraj.
non cooperation with the British rule programme adopted at the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920
WHO
The WHO is an agency of the United Nations set up in 1948 to improve health globally.
Its primary aim is “to promote health, keep the world safe and serve the vulnerable”. It has no power to impose health policies on national governments, but acts as an adviser and offers guidance on best practice in disease prevention and health improvement. It has three main strands of work: aiming for universal health coverage in every country, preventing and responding to acute emergencies, promoting health and wellbeing for all.
Satyagraha
the idea of Satyagraha emphasized the power of truth and the need to search of a truth
if the cause is true, if the struggle against injustice them no physical force required to fight the oppressor
a Satyagrahi could win the battle through non violence
In Satyagraha , the conscience of the oppressed person appeal the conscience of oppressor to see the truth rather than forcing him to accept the truth