q. in the grasslands, trees do not replace the grasses as a part of an ecological succession because of (2013)a) insects and fungi b) limited sunlight and paucity of nutrients c) water limits and fire d) none of the above
Answers
Answered by
0
hey !
__________________
In the grasslands trees don't replace grasses as a part of an ecological succession because of
Water limits and fire .
Water and fire both are a necessary need in human life
Especially we can't survive without water.
Hence option C is satisfactory .
__________________
✌
__________________
In the grasslands trees don't replace grasses as a part of an ecological succession because of
Water limits and fire .
Water and fire both are a necessary need in human life
Especially we can't survive without water.
Hence option C is satisfactory .
__________________
✌
Answered by
3
heya!!
here is your answer ⤵️⤵️
Option C is the answer.
hope my answer helps you
here is your answer ⤵️⤵️
Option C is the answer.
hope my answer helps you
Similar questions